AI

Artificial intelligence has already transformed many industries, but the world of scientific research has been waiting for a true game-changer. While general AI models are powerful, they often lack the specialized knowledge needed for deep scientific inquiry. Enter Intern-S1, a new multimodal foundation model that’s set to bridge this gap and accelerate a new era of discovery. Developed by the Shanghai AI Laboratory, Intern-S1 is not just another large language model. It’s a specialized generalist, designed from the ground up to understand and process complex scientific data in various formats, from text and images to time-series data. ...

We are in the midst of an AI gold rush, where companies are investing billions to build increasingly intelligent models. The final, crucial step in this process is often Reinforcement Learning (RL), the “finishing school” where an AI agent learns to master complex tasks through trial and error. However, this training process at an industrial scale is plagued by two crippling problems: crippling inefficiency and maddening complexity. It’s like trying to run a state-of-the-art factory where half the machines are always idle and every product requires a complete retooling of the assembly line. ...

Modern systems based on Machine Learning (ML) are ubiquitous, from credit scoring to fraud detection. The conventional wisdom is that more data leads to better models. However, this data-centric approach directly conflicts with a fundamental legal principle: data minimization (DM). This principle, enshrined in key regulations like the GDPR in Europe and the CPRA in California, mandates that personal data collection and processing must be “adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed”. ...

In an era where Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 or Llama seem to understand the world, a fundamental challenge remains: how to teach them effectively and efficiently? The standard method is Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), which involves “feeding” the model thousands of examples of correct responses. However, as the groundbreaking paper “On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification” (arXiv:2508.05629) points out, SFT has a hidden flaw that limits its true potential. ...

In a world where robots and AI systems increasingly learn through observation and interaction with humans, the efficiency of this process remains a key challenge. Traditional Imitation Learning methods often require a human teacher to constantly supervise and correct errors, which is time-consuming and costly. A team of researchers led by Jelle Luijkx proposes a groundbreaking solution in their latest paper, “ASkDAgger: Active Skill-level Data Aggregation for Interactive Imitation Learning.” ...

Can computers learn to “hear” the rhythm in a stream of data, much like we hear the rhythm in music? And by using this skill, can they better protect us from equipment failures, financial fraud, or health problems? A new scientific paper titled “CaPulse: Detecting Anomalies by Tuning in to the Causal Rhythms of Time Series” attempts to answer these questions. The Problem with Anomalies We live in a world of data. From our heartbeats and stock market fluctuations to energy consumption in a smart city—all of this is time series data, collected at regular intervals. Often lurking within this data are anomalies: strange, unexpected events that can signal a problem. This could be a sudden cardiac arrhythmia, a suspicious bank transaction, or an impending engine failure in a factory. ...

In a world where artificial intelligence (AI) is solving increasingly complex problems, formal mathematical theorem proving remains one of the toughest challenges. It’s the Mount Everest of machine reasoning, demanding not only immense computational power but, above all, deep, logical deduction. The scientific paper “Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correction” introduces a breakthrough system that elevates automated proving to a new level. 🤖 System Architecture At the heart of Goedel-Prover-V2 is an advanced language model, specially trained and adapted to work with proof assistants like Lean. The system’s architecture is based on a cyclical interaction between several key components: ...

In the world of artificial intelligence, data is the fuel that powers machine learning models. But what if that fuel is contaminated? Mislabeled data, known as label noise, is a huge problem that can cause even the best algorithms to learn complete nonsense. The paper “ε-Softmax: Approximating One-Hot Vectors for Mitigating Label Noise,” accepted at the prestigious NeurIPS 2024 conference, offers an elegant solution. The Problem: When a Model Blindly Trusts Its Labels Let’s imagine we’re training a model to recognize animals. We show it a picture of a cute cat. In the traditional approach, we give it an absolutely certain piece of information, a so-called one-hot vector: ...

In the field of machine learning, a model’s ability to assess its own confidence is crucial for its reliability, especially in high-stakes applications like medicine or autonomous vehicles. The arXiv paper 2508.00754, titled “A Simple and Effective Method for Uncertainty Quantification and OOD Detection”, by Yaxin Ma, Benjamin Colburn, and Jose C. Principe, introduces an innovative and efficient approach to this problem. The paper focuses on two related concepts: uncertainty quantification and Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection. ...

The paper introduces RLVMR, a novel framework for reinforcement learning (RL) that integrates verifiable meta‑reasoning rewards to strengthen long‑horizon performance. It enables agents to generate internal explanatory signals and be explicitly evaluated using meta‑reasoning criteria, enhancing robustness and planning over extended trajectories :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}. Contributions A formal definition of meta‑reasoning rewards: agents receive additional reward signals based on the verifiability of reasoning chains. A verifiable protocol: using checkable reasoning traces to assess agent justification. Empirical validation on long‑horizon RL tasks showing improved performance vs. standard RL baselines :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}. Method Let the agent generate reasoning chain $r = (r_1,\dots,r_T)$ alongside actions $a_t$. The total reward is: $$ R_{\text{total}} = \sum_t R_{\text{env}}(a_t) + \lambda,R_{\text{meta}}(r), $$ where $R_{\text{meta}}(r)$ is high only if reasoning can be verified according to protocol; $\lambda$ tunes the meta‑reasoning influence. ...