<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Coding-Agents on MLLog.dev</title><link>https://mllog.dev/en/tags/coding-agents/</link><description>Recent content in Coding-Agents on MLLog.dev</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.9</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mllog.dev/en/tags/coding-agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SWE-Explore: The Benchmark That Finally Asks — Did Your Coding Agent Read the Right Code?</title><link>https://mllog.dev/en/posts/swe-explore-benchmarking-coding-agents-repository-exploration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://mllog.dev/en/posts/swe-explore-benchmarking-coding-agents-repository-exploration/</guid><description>SWE-Explore isolates repository exploration from patch generation, revealing that coding agents find the right files ~65% of the time but recall only ~15-19% of the lines that actually matter — and that context efficiency predicts downstream resolve rate with Pearson r = 0.950.</description></item></channel></rss>