<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Evaluation on MLLog.dev</title><link>https://mllog.dev/en/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on MLLog.dev</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.9</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mllog.dev/en/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Lost in Stories: How LLMs Lose the Thread in Long Narratives</title><link>https://mllog.dev/en/posts/constory-consistency-bugs-long-stories-llm/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://mllog.dev/en/posts/constory-consistency-bugs-long-stories-llm/</guid><description>&lt;p>Ask any language model to write a 10,000-word story. On page one, the hero has blue eyes. By page five — brown. In chapter three it&amp;rsquo;s Thursday; in chapter six, the same day is suddenly Saturday. A character who died on page seven is chatting away on page ten.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Sound familiar? The paper &lt;strong>&amp;ldquo;Lost in Stories: Consistency Bugs in Long Story Generation by LLMs&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong> systematically investigates this problem for the first time — and the results are sobering. Even the best models produce an average of &lt;strong>one consistency error per 10,000 words&lt;/strong>, and human experts catch only 17% of them.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>